1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 »

mutantranger:

coffeedyke:

How to tell they’re gay:

• They do not sit in chairs properly.

The real homosexual agenda is sitting on tables. Or floors. Or two chairs at once with your feet propped up on one.

I feel exposed

prep4goth:

Once I uhaul with my gf I’m deleting my blog like have fun with ur thesis long call out posts and ur Tumblr cliques u weird bitches…I’ll be busy getting rawed and growing fresh basil

themoufofthesouth:

peskierpendejo:

IHOB

International

House

Of

Bussy

snarthurt:

snoopingasusualisee:

snarthurt:

snoopingasusualisee:

snarthurt:

robot chicken is problematic?

it is? huh…well good thing i can trust south park

bad news………

what’s the news?

evilscientist:

thank you to all the followers who give me that 1 note on my text posts

apparentlyeverything:

There’s a lot of discussion right now about whether “PDA” is appropriate at Pride events, so here’s a reminder that the very first Pride event in 1970 (called the Christopher Street Liberation Day Parade) featured a “Gay-In” with same-sex couples showing public affection for each other:  

“Gay-in” in Central Park during the 1st Christopher St Liberation Day Parade in NYC, 1970

Similar events were held at other Prides in the 70s and 80s. In this period, displays of same-sex affection were especially encouraged, and some even featured gay “kissing booths”:

Three couples take advantage of the Gay Band Kissing Booth at the Los Angeles Christopher Street West Pride Parade, in 1982 

This was not casual, it was an intentional choice meant to send a specific political message that LGBT people would no longer stay hidden. People who say that PDA grosses them out no matter who does it are missing the point entirely. Public displays of affection among LGBT people within the context of Pride are part of its historical political message and significance. Refusing to  engage with and understand that context is inherently reactionary.